From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752519AbbIPLt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:49:27 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:36004 "EHLO mail-la0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752074AbbIPLt0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:49:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:48:57 +0200 From: Vitaly Wool To: ddstreet@ieee.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, minchan@kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] prepare zbud to be used by zram as underlying allocator Message-Id: <20150916134857.e4a71f601a1f68cfa16cb361@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, as a follow-up to my previous patchset, I decided to first prepare zbud/zpool related patches and then have some testing rounds and performance measurements for zram running over both, and come up with improved/verified zram/zpool patches then. So for now, here comes the zbud/zpool part. -- Vitaly Wool