From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751659AbbIQKnx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:43:53 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:60229 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262AbbIQKnw (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:43:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:38:25 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Morten Rasmussen Cc: Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steve Muckle , "mingo@redhat.com" , "daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" , "yuyang.du@intel.com" , "mturquette@baylibre.com" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , Juri Lelli , "sgurrappadi@nvidia.com" , "pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/fair: Get rid of scaling utilization by capacity_orig Message-ID: <20150917103825.GG3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <55EDDD5A.70904@arm.com> <20150908122606.GH3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150908125205.GW18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150908143157.GA27098@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150908165331.GC27098@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150909094305.GO3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150909111309.GD27098@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20150911172246.GI27098@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911172246.GI27098@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 06:22:47PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > While at it, should I include Yuyang's patch redefining the SCALE/SHIFT > mess? I suspect his patch will fail to compile on ARM which uses SCHED_CAPACITY_* outside of kernel/sched/*. But if you all (Ben, Yuyang, you) can agree on a patch simplifying these things I'm not opposed to it.