public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	nm@ti.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: of_property_count_u32_elems() can return errors
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:13:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150917181328.GQ23081@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46a47430b8d65f509d47fe3ad1264c6b23086d61.1442508974.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 09/17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -889,13 +889,22 @@ static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
>  /* TODO: Support multiple regulators */
>  static int opp_get_microvolt(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct device *dev)
>  {
> +	struct property *prop;
>  	u32 microvolt[3] = {0};
>  	int count, ret;
>  
> -	count = of_property_count_u32_elems(opp->np, "opp-microvolt");
> -	if (!count)
> +	/* Missing property isn't a problem, but an invalid entry is */
> +	prop = of_find_property(opp->np, "opp-microvolt", NULL);

Prop isn't used anywhere so why not remove the local variable and
test the result of this call inside the if condition?

> +	if (!prop)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	count = of_property_count_u32_elems(opp->np, "opp-microvolt");
> +	if (count < 0) {

We can't test count for -EINVAL to detect the missing property
because -EINVAL is also returned on a non-multiple of u32 length
property? Maybe we shouldn't worry about that case and turn
-EINVAL into 0.

> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid opp-microvolt property (%d)\n",
> +			__func__, count);
> +		return count;

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-17 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17 17:00 [PATCH] PM / OPP: of_property_count_u32_elems() can return errors Viresh Kumar
2015-09-17 18:13 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-09-19  3:21   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-19 22:22     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-22 16:35       ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150917181328.GQ23081@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox