From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751929AbbIRHqA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:46:00 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:44899 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751000AbbIRHp7 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:45:59 -0400
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:46:14 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Wang Dongsheng <Dongsheng.Wang@freescale.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
        "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
        Huan Wang <alison.wang@freescale.com>,
        "Zhao C.H." <chenhui.zhao@freescale.com>,
        Jin Jason <Jason.Jin@freescale.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/ls1021a: Add Sleep feature for ls1021
Message-ID: <20150918074614.GA876@red-moon>
References: <1441877796-32232-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
 <20150910095920.GB29293@leverpostej>
 <SN1PR0301MB161620AA4926EEF6541D901E9D500@SN1PR0301MB1616.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <20150917123155.GC12808@leverpostej>
 <SN1PR0301MB1616F01085CC4549FFE3A1469D590@SN1PR0301MB1616.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0301MB1616F01085CC4549FFE3A1469D590@SN1PR0301MB1616.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:37:15AM +0100, Wang Dongsheng wrote:

[...]

> > > How about PSCI 1.0 support, could you share some information about it?
> > 
> > Lorenzo has implemented basic PSCI 1.0 support [1,2], and Sudeep has been
> > working on SYSTEM_SUSPEND [3], though I'm not immediately aware of the state of
> > the world there.
> > 
> > Do you have any specific questions?
> > 
> 
> There is no problem, I just want to use V1.0 to support our platform SYSTEM_SUSPEND,
> but 1.0 implementation is not in v4.3-rc1, so abandon this.

It will be in v4.4, so you can drop this patch then.

Thanks,
Lorenzo