From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753728AbbIRNQs (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:16:48 -0400 Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:57147 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751068AbbIRNQq (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:16:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:16:15 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: Linus Torvalds CC: Dave Chinner , Jens Axboe , Jan Kara , Josef Bacik , LKML , linux-fsdevel , Neil Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs-writeback: drop wb->list_lock during blk_finish_plug() Message-ID: <20150918131615.GI8624@ret.masoncoding.com> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Mason , Linus Torvalds , Dave Chinner , Jens Axboe , Jan Kara , Josef Bacik , LKML , linux-fsdevel , Neil Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Tejun Heo References: <20150917021453.GO3902@dastard> <20150917224230.GF8624@ret.masoncoding.com> <20150917235647.GG8624@ret.masoncoding.com> <20150918003735.GR3902@dastard> <20150918054044.GT3902@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) X-Originating-IP: [192.168.52.123] X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe X-FB-Internal: Safe X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-09-18_06:2015-09-18,2015-09-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:04:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > Ok, makes sense - the plug is not being flushed as we switch away, > > but Chris' patch makes it do that. > > Yup. Huh, that does make much more sense, thanks Linus. I'm wondering where else I've assumed that cond_resched() unplugged. > > And I actually think Chris' patch is better than the one I sent out > (but maybe the scheduler people should take a look at the behavior of > cond_resched()), I just wanted you to test that to verify the > behavior. Ok, I'll fix up the description and comments and send out. -chris