linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: lpc_ich: Separate device cells for clarity
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:13:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150919101329.GM3218@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442506679.8361.85.camel@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 14:14 -0500, Aaron Sierra wrote:
> > The lpc_ich_cells array gives the wrong impression about the
> > relationship between the watchdog and GPIO devices. They are
> > completely distinct devices, so this patch separates the
> > array into distinct mfd_cell structs per device.
> > 
> > A side effect of removing the array, is that the lpc_cells enum
> > is no longer needed.
> > 
> 
> Looks good for me.

Is that an Ack?  If so, can you formally provide one please?

> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > -
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > index 8de3439..7a01d430 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c
> > @@ -131,24 +131,18 @@ static struct resource gpio_ich_res[] = {
> >  	},
> >  };
> >  
> > -enum lpc_cells {
> > -	LPC_WDT = 0,
> > -	LPC_GPIO,
> > +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_wdt_cell = {
> > +	.name = "iTCO_wdt",
> > +	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> > +	.resources = wdt_ich_res,
> > +	.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_cells[] = {
> > -	[LPC_WDT] = {
> > -		.name = "iTCO_wdt",
> > -		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_ich_res),
> > -		.resources = wdt_ich_res,
> > -		.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > -	},
> > -	[LPC_GPIO] = {
> > -		.name = "gpio_ich",
> > -		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> > -		.resources = gpio_ich_res,
> > -		.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> > -	},
> > +static struct mfd_cell lpc_ich_gpio_cell = {
> > +	.name = "gpio_ich",
> > +	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_ich_res),
> > +	.resources = gpio_ich_res,
> > +	.ignore_resource_conflicts = true,
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* chipset related info */
> > @@ -881,7 +875,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0x0000ff80;
> >  	if (!base_addr) {
> >  		dev_notice(&dev->dev, "I/O space for ACPI 
> > uninitialized\n");
> > -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> > +		lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
> >  		goto gpe0_done;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -895,7 +889,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_gpio(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  		 * the platform_device subsystem doesn't see this 
> > resource
> >  		 * or it will register an invalid region.
> >  		 */
> > -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].num_resources--;
> > +		lpc_ich_gpio_cell.num_resources--;
> >  		acpi_conflict = true;
> >  	} else {
> >  		lpc_ich_enable_acpi_space(dev);
> > @@ -933,14 +927,14 @@ gpe0_done:
> >  	lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].use_gpio = ret;
> >  	lpc_ich_enable_gpio_space(dev);
> >  
> > -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO]);
> > +	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_gpio_cell);
> >  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > -			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO], 1, NULL, 0, 
> > NULL);
> > +			      &lpc_ich_gpio_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >  
> >  gpio_done:
> >  	if (acpi_conflict)
> >  		pr_warn("Resource conflict(s) found affecting %s\n",
> > -				lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO].name);
> > +				lpc_ich_gpio_cell.name);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -984,7 +978,7 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version == 1) {
> >  		/* Don't register iomem for TCO ver 1 */
> > -		lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT].num_resources--;
> > +		lpc_ich_wdt_cell.num_resources--;
> >  	} else if (lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].iTCO_version == 
> > 2) {
> >  		pci_read_config_dword(dev, RCBABASE, 
> > &base_addr_cfg);
> >  		base_addr = base_addr_cfg & 0xffffc000;
> > @@ -1007,9 +1001,9 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev 
> > *dev)
> >  		res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_PMC_END;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT]);
> > +	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_wdt_cell);
> >  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > -			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT], 1, NULL, 0, 
> > NULL);
> > +			      &lpc_ich_wdt_cell, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> >  
> >  wdt_done:
> >  	return ret;
> 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-19 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <665163563.75615.1441306612262.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com>
2015-09-03 19:14 ` [PATCH] mfd: lpc_ich: Separate device cells for clarity Aaron Sierra
2015-09-17 16:17   ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-09-19 10:13     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-09-22 11:36       ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-09-19 10:16   ` Lee Jones
2015-09-21 17:37     ` Aaron Sierra
2015-09-21 23:13   ` Lee Jones
2015-09-22 22:41   ` Lee Jones
2015-09-23  0:04   ` [PATCH v2] " Aaron Sierra
2015-09-23  0:31     ` Lee Jones
2015-09-23 14:13       ` Aaron Sierra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150919101329.GM3218@x1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=asierra@xes-inc.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).