From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755864AbbIUF21 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:28:27 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33391 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750913AbbIUF20 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:28:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:28:24 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, olaf@aepfle.de, apw@canonical.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, Jake Oshins Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drivers:hv: Export the API to invoke a hypercall on Hyper-V Message-ID: <20150921052824.GC24350@kroah.com> References: <1442366782-23929-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1442366809-23968-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1442366809-23968-2-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1442366809-23968-2-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 06:26:48PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > From: Jake Oshins > > This patch exposes the function that hv_vmbus.ko uses to make hypercalls. This > is necessary for retargeting an interrupt when it is given a new affinity. > > Since we are exporting this API, rename the API as it will be visible outside > the hv.c file. > > Signed-off-by: Jake Oshins > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan > --- > drivers/hv/hv.c | 9 +++++---- > include/linux/hyperv.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c > index 6341be8..a7b6c6a 100644 > --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c > @@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ static int query_hypervisor_info(void) > } > > /* > - * do_hypercall- Invoke the specified hypercall > + * hv_do_hypercall- Invoke the specified hypercall > */ > -static u64 do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output) > +u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output) > { > u64 input_address = (input) ? virt_to_phys(input) : 0; > u64 output_address = (output) ? virt_to_phys(output) : 0; > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ static u64 do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output) > return hv_status_lo | ((u64)hv_status_hi << 32); > #endif /* !x86_64 */ > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_do_hypercall); > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > static cycle_t read_hv_clock_tsc(struct clocksource *arg) > @@ -329,7 +330,7 @@ int hv_post_message(union hv_connection_id connection_id, > aligned_msg->payload_size = payload_size; > memcpy((void *)aligned_msg->payload, payload, payload_size); > > - status = do_hypercall(HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE, aligned_msg, NULL) > + status = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE, aligned_msg, NULL) > & 0xFFFF; > > put_cpu(); > @@ -347,7 +348,7 @@ u16 hv_signal_event(void *con_id) > { > u16 status; > > - status = (do_hypercall(HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT, con_id, NULL) & 0xFFFF); > + status = (hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT, con_id, NULL) & 0xFFFF); What's with the crazy () around a function call? And why are you passing a 64bit return value into a 16bit status value? That seems like something is broken.