From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933003AbbIUWNn (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:13:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:36194 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932186AbbIUWNl (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:13:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:13:38 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Alex Smith , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alex Smith , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] mtd: nand: jz4780: driver for NAND devices on JZ4780 SoCs Message-ID: <20150921221338.GD31505@google.com> References: <1441703453-2838-1-git-send-email-alex.smith@imgtec.com> <1441703453-2838-4-git-send-email-alex.smith@imgtec.com> <20150909142439.GA2371@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:38:48PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 9 September 2015 at 11:24, Ezequiel Garcia > wrote: > Whatever the outcome of the discussion on patch 1/4 > "mtd: nand: increase ready wait timeout and report timeouts" > is, the jz4780-specific patches should remain unaffected to it. > > In fact, I believe patch 1/4 shouldn't even be on the same series. > So, maybe you can consider taking the rest (or not) independently > of that patch? Sure, I'll consider the fate of patch 1 separately from 2-4.