From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755076AbbIWQOD (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:14:03 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:47294 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753714AbbIWQOB (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:14:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:12:53 -0700 From: Mark Brown To: Koro Chen Cc: tiwai@suse.de, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Message-ID: <20150923161253.GN30445@sirena.org.uk> References: <1442213477-63721-1-git-send-email-koro.chen@mediatek.com> <1443002599.22786.2.camel@mtksdaap41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Mqntr8YLmpnm4ZyH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443002599.22786.2.camel@mtksdaap41> X-Cookie: NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.35.39.2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: Increase periods_min in capture X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Mqntr8YLmpnm4ZyH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 06:03:19PM +0800, Koro Chen wrote: > Any suggestion for this patch? >=20 > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 14:51 +0800, Koro Chen wrote: > > In capture, there is chance that hw_ptr reported at IRQ is > > a little smaller than period_size due to internal AFE buffer. > > In the case of ping-pong buffer: Please don't top post or send content free pings. I'm not entirely sure what you're asking for here - the patch has been applied, what further suggestions were you looking for? --Mqntr8YLmpnm4ZyH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWAs+EAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQr2sH/2DcvAQXsNg0/6FjockBC4Pf rWi+D4koFVTphUJcJeSmBEpureHRAlm77rV0CojzZkej4bjzvZ9VJ5X9erpLybhC AdCX5g5Je5okkDtv05QYSYWGLfE57rxuF4d88yUAsmq/XG6viJHkgkX2JOxCFX5l OZI3hgSdV6GU2jsituqXoFRpaAukdprl6Wd04FADL2bwpsWAlKUrz1hS8RJzeANQ 0nESlXNVrka/+QLyz028yothLAy5/bXPYYdHFK2YJM/IRH8N457Y5qOdFhXgx5v2 7VqFWOBDjEqI/19YKnDQAXLt/kslrvJ+ZsaIG0HgrdxsFkiCvwGye2fOM/7C6Jw= =hatT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Mqntr8YLmpnm4ZyH--