From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting PERF_REGS
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:57:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150924125703.GA11857@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443096718-11926-1-git-send-email-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:41:58PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> perf build currently fails on powerpc:
>
> LINK perf
> libperf.a(libperf-in.o):(.toc+0x120): undefined reference to
> `sample_reg_masks'
> libperf.a(libperf-in.o):(.toc+0x130): undefined reference to
> `sample_reg_masks'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [perf] Error 1
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> This is due to parse-regs-options.c using sample_reg_masks, which is
> defined only with CONFIG_PERF_REGS.
>
> In addition, perf record -I is only useful if the arch supports
> PERF_REGS. Hence, let's expose -I conditionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
hum, I wonder why we have sample_reg_masks defined as weak in util/perf_regs.c
which is also built only via CONFIG_PERF_REGS
I wonder we could get rid of the weak definition via attached patch, Stephane?
anyway this looks ok
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/Build
index ff63649fa9ac..e5627b3d1bb8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/Build
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ libperf-y += header.o
libperf-y += tsc.o
libperf-y += pmu.o
libperf-y += kvm-stat.o
-libperf-y += perf_regs.o
+libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
libperf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-regs.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 885e8ac83997..43168fb0d9a2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -2,10 +2,6 @@
#include "perf_regs.h"
#include "event.h"
-const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
- SMPL_REG_END
-};
-
int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
{
int i, idx = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 12:11 [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting PERF_REGS Naveen N. Rao
2015-09-24 12:57 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2015-09-24 15:32 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-09-24 16:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-24 16:45 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-09-29 5:36 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-09-29 6:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-29 8:00 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-09-29 10:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-29 16:31 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-09-29 17:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-29 18:10 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-29 20:36 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150924125703.GA11857@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox