From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755592AbbIXP1g (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:27:36 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:34335 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752132AbbIXP1e (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:27:34 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:57:27 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
        Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] page-flags: rectify forward declaration
Message-ID: <20150924152727.GB10109@sudip-pc>
References: <1442682779-20077-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
 <1442682779-20077-4-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
 <20150921153509.fef7ecdf313ef74307c43b65@linux-foundation.org>
 <20150922085534.GA4122@sudip-pc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150922085534.GA4122@sudip-pc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> > 
> > Also, I'm finding that the patch series introduces a pretty large
> > bisection hole:
> > 
> > include/linux/page-flags.h: In function 'PageYoung':
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: implicit declaration of function 'PF_ANY'
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> > include/linux/page-flags.h:327: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'int')
> > 
> > which later gets fixed up by
> > page-flags-rectify-forward-declaration.patch.
> How to test this? Should I apply them on top of v4.2 and bisect? And I
> don't see any relation between the first two patches and this patch of
> the series, then how does it fail in bisect? Am I missing something?
> Confused.. :(
> > 
> > Maybe it's time to do a wholesale refactoring of the patchset?
> If this patch is the first in the series will that help?
> And besides I got the auto mail from you that the patch is applied.
> Now totally confused.. :(
Ohhh ..all the time you were talking about Kirill's patch set and I kept
thinking you are mentioning about this patchset. :)

regards
sudip