Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing

Lee Jones
2015-09-11T16:30:41Z

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> I have picked this patchset [0] up from Lee to rebase it, with an aim to
> get this series moving again.
>
> This resend fixes up my SoB's as highlighted by Lee
>
> A couple of minor issues were resolved in the rebase. As it stood, Javier
> proposed [1] to merge this series, and use a follow up series to make sure
> that all I2C drivers are using a MODLE_DEVICE_TABLE(of,...)
>
> I have prepared a Coccinelle patch to work through the bulk of the changes
> required for the conversion, which will assist the transition process.
>
> Once this patch set is accepted, I will commence converting the other
> drivers, and submitting with a per subsystem breakdown or simliar to
> reduce traffic.
>
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/28/283
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/496

I appreciate that my SoB is on every patch, but this set still looks
good to me, so for extra clarification:

Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

[...]

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog