From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753677AbbIXUZJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:25:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:37155 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751843AbbIXUZH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:25:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:25:03 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Hugh Dickins , Dave Hansen , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Naoya Horiguchi , Steve Capper , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Jerome Marchand , Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Refreshed page-flags patchset Message-ID: <20150924202503.GA24381@node.dhcp.inet.fi> References: <20150921153509.fef7ecdf313ef74307c43b65@linux-foundation.org> <1443106264-78075-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:13:22AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > As requested, here's reworked version of page-flags patchset. > > Updated version should fit more naturally into current code base. > > This is certainly great for specialized debugging hunting for improper > handling of page flags for compound pages but a regular debug > kernel will get a mass of VM_BUG_ON(s) at numerous page flag uses in the > code. Is that really useful in general for a debug kernel? As I said before, it was useful for me in few cases. I can wrap these VM_BUG_ONs under separate config, if it helps. -- Kirill A. Shutemov