From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755825AbbIYIwh (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 04:52:37 -0400 Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.108]:60914 "EHLO e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755527AbbIYIwc (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 04:52:32 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: ivan@ru.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: davem@davemloft.net;ben@decadent.org.uk;benh@kernel.crashing.org;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:53:06 +0400 From: Ivan Mikhaylov To: "David Miller" Cc: "" , "" , "" , "" Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ibm/emac: bump version numbers for correct work with ethtool Message-ID: <20150925115306.7fee87d4@fr-ThinkPad-W520> In-Reply-To: <20150924.225303.2108696869753819019.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20150923144222.66de305c@fr-ThinkPad-W520> <20150923.110549.113067983983388057.davem@davemloft.net> <20150925080752.14a2fee6@fr-ThinkPad-W520> <20150924.225303.2108696869753819019.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on D06ML401/06/M/IBM(Release 9.0.1FP4HF67 | July 7, 2015) at 25/09/2015 11:52:25, Serialize by Router on D06ML401/06/M/IBM(Release 9.0.1FP4HF67 | July 7, 2015) at 25/09/2015 11:52:26, Serialize complete at 25/09/2015 11:52:26 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15092508-0009-0000-0000-000005BAFEF0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:53:03 -0700 (PDT) "David Miller" wrote: > From: Ivan Mikhaylov > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:07:52 +0400 > > > Ben proposed one, is it eligible? > > Need I resubmit patch with sign and detailed description? > > If I genuinely need to answer that question, maybe you should sit back > for a little while and think about it yourself, ok? Sorry, for those stupid questions. David, Ben, thanks for the help.