From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753144AbbI0Tm0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:42:26 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50470 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752204AbbI0TmZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:42:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:42:24 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby , Joachim Eastwood , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular Message-ID: <20150927194224.GA1055@kroah.com> References: <1440020889-12120-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20150926225347.GC1279@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150926225347.GC1279@windriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 06:53:47PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [[PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/tty: make more bool drivers explicitly non-modular] On 19/08/2015 (Wed 17:48) Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > [v2: drop dead module code removal from 8250_lpc18xx.c ; instead convert it > > from bool to tristate ; also add ack to hvc_console commit.] > > > > This second set of patches to drivers/tty steps outside of the serial > > dir, and an improved auditing finds two more serial drivers pretending > > to be modular that really are not. > > Hi Greg -- wondering if this is still in your to-do queue. I see the > patches to drivers/char that I sent about the same time made it onto > your char-testing branch but not these onto tty-testing. Yes, they are in my queue, haven't caught up with tty patches yet :( > The reason I ask is that I've about a 1/2 dozen more similar patches > that showed up once I started auditing non-x86 code. I don't want to > re-spam you with these along with the new ones, if these are still in > your backlog for processing. I can handle resends and other patches just fine, send away! thanks, greg k-h