From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965423AbbI2O3k (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:29:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:34078 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965320AbbI2O3i (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:29:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:29:32 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Herbert Xu Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Peter Korsgaard , Fabio Estevam , Kieran Bingham , "kernel@stlinux.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] hwrng: Add support for STMicroelectronics' RNG IP Message-ID: <20150929142932.GY27197@x1> References: <1442497557-9271-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20150918140756.GK9249@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150918151137.GA10763@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150918155112.GE3218@x1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150918155112.GE3218@x1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:53:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On 18 September 2015 at 15:07, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:45:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >> v1 => v2: > > > >> - New patch: Also fixing /dev/hw_random => /dev/hwrng in Kconfig > > > >> - Fix 2099 => 2009 typo in commit log > > > >> - Fix 'number of random numbers sourced' return value > > > >> - Treat devm_clk_get()'s return value correctly > > > >> - Check return value of clk_prepare_enable() > > > >> - Use sysfs_streq() instead of manually stripping '\n' from sysfs > > > > > > > > All applied. Thanks. > > > > > > Just to be clear. Which patches have you applied? > > > > All of your patches. > > I think it's okay for you to take all but patch 6. > > Patch 6 is an ARM patch and needs to go into ARM SoC via > STMicroelectronics STi tree. Hi Herbert, I see that your tree is 8 days old, so this may have been resolved already, but would you be kind enough to ensure you remove the 6th (ARM) patch from your repo please? I wouldn't want it to cause conflicts and for Maxime and yourself to get shouted at by Linus. Much appreciated. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog