From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753827AbbI3GMu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:12:50 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:33846 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753103AbbI3GMs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:12:48 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:42:41 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/gma500: fix double freeing
Message-ID: <20150930061241.GC3500@sudip-pc>
References: <1441803040-15998-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
 <20150924155725.GE10109@sudip-pc>
 <CAMeQTsZvcpL3MRF_VTR_nvbhKKUTK-+c_kEc2UBP2t6WzAr3vg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMeQTsZvcpL3MRF_VTR_nvbhKKUTK-+c_kEc2UBP2t6WzAr3vg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:20:35PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:20:40PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >> If backing->stolen is true then we were freeing backing by calling
> >> psb_gtt_free_range() but we called it again after unlocking the mutex.
> >> Lets make it NULL after freeing in psb_gtt_free_range() and check for
> >> NULL before calling the function for the second time.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> >> ---
> > Hi Patrik,
> > A gentle ping.
> >
> > regards
> > sudip
> 
> Hi, sorry for the late reply.
> 
> Why are we freeing the range twice in the first case?
I think,
if backing->stolen is true then backing is released using
psb_gtt_free_range() but if backing->stolen is false then the gem object
is freed but the backing is not yet freed. To free that backing
psb_gtt_free_range() has been called second time. My patch tried to fix
the possibility of backing->stolen being true and backing being freed 2
times.

regards
sudip