From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753893AbbI3GZN (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:25:13 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:43380 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753319AbbI3GZI (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:25:08 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,611,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="780615201" Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:54:22 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Robert Jarzmik Cc: Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: pxa_dma: fix the no-requestor case Message-ID: <20150930062422.GC21690@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com> References: <1441905466-17459-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1441905466-17459-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:17:45PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > A very small number of devices don't use the flow control offered by > requestor lines. In these specific cases, the pxa dma driver should be > aware of that and not try to use a requestor line. And these fail for me, what were these sent against? Please rebase and resend -- ~Vinod