From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754487AbbI3ICM (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:02:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:33453 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753725AbbI3ICC (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:02:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:03:59 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Vitaly Wool Cc: ddstreet@ieee.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Seth Jennings , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel , Linux-MM Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] align zpool/zbud/zsmalloc on the api Message-ID: <20150930080359.GD12727@bbox> References: <20150926100401.96a36c7cd3c913b063887466@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150926100401.96a36c7cd3c913b063887466@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:04:01AM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote: > Here comes the second iteration over zpool/zbud/zsmalloc API alignment. > This time I divide it into three patches: for zpool, for zbud and for zsmalloc :) > Patches are non-intrusive and do not change any existing functionality. They only > add up stuff for the alignment purposes. It exposes new API which needs justification in description.