public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return?
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:18:28 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150930131828.GG1944@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50399556C9727B4D88A595C8584AAB375256E050@GSjpTKYDCembx32.service.hitachi.net>

Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:05:09AM +0000, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [mailto:acme@kernel.org]
> >
> >How to figure out which variables can I collect at function return?
> >None?
> 
> At first, it seems the below pattern failed to get the probe point itself,
> because you're specifying the return point of an inlined function, which
> is nowhere.

Would be really nice to have this warning emitted to the user, as well
as bits and pieces of the following explanations.

- Arnaldo
 
> If you give a function which has actual instance, perf-probe may show
> the variables which will be accessable in the entry of the function as below.
> 
> $ sudo ./perf probe -V "vfs_read%return"
> Available variables at vfs_read%return
>         @<vfs_read+0>
>                 char*   buf
>                 loff_t* pos
>                 size_t  count
>                 struct file*    file
> 
> However, this may not work on the arguments passed by registers,
> since those may be already broken by the operations in the function.
> 
> So, to get correct accessible variables at return, you must give an actual
> line number in the function currently.
> 
> $ sudo ./perf probe -L vfs_read
> <vfs_read@/home/mhiramat/ksrc/linux-3/fs/read_write.c:0>
>       0  ssize_t vfs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, lof
>       1  {
>                 ssize_t ret;
> 
>       4         if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
>       5                 return -EBADF;
>       6         if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_READ))
>       7                 return -EINVAL;
>       8         if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count)))
>       9                 return -EFAULT;
> 
>      11         ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file, pos, count);
>      12         if (ret >= 0) {
>                         count = ret;
>      14                 ret = __vfs_read(file, buf, count, pos);
>      15                 if (ret > 0) {
>      16                         fsnotify_access(file);
>      17                         add_rchar(current, ret);
>                         }
>      19                 inc_syscr(current);
>                 }
> 
>                 return ret;
>      23  }
> 
> $ sudo ./perf probe -V vfs_read:23
> Available variables at vfs_read:23
>         @<vfs_read+214>
>                 char*   buf
>                 loff_t* pos
>                 size_t  count
>                 struct file*    file
> 
> 
> >
> >I think we need a better error message :-)
> >
> >[root@zoo ~]# perf probe -V getname_flags%return Return probe must be on the head of a real function.
> 
> It seems that perf probe said " Return probe must be on the head of a real function."
> So this means it can not find the given probe point because the %return is not 
> put on the entry of the function which has actual instance.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> >Debuginfo analysis failed.
> >  Error: Failed to show vars.
> >[root@zoo ~]#
> >
> >
> >- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-30 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-28 14:52 [perf probe] How to ask what variables can be collected at function return? Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-30  8:05 ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
2015-09-30 13:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-09-30 16:48     ` 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150930131828.GG1944@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox