From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755164AbbJACM3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:12:29 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:47919 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753328AbbJACM1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:12:27 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,615,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="801034712" Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:45:21 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Robert Jarzmik Cc: Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma: pxa_dma: fix the no-requestor case Message-ID: <20151001021521.GF11757@localhost> References: <1443634935-28989-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443634935-28989-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 07:42:14PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > A very small number of devices don't use the flow control offered by > requestor lines. In these specific cases, the pxa dma driver should be > aware of that and not try to use a requestor line. Applied both now Btw what happened to subsytem name here!! -- ~Vinod