linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Kyle Walker <kwalker@redhat.com>,
	Stanislav Kozina <skozina@redhat.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process()
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:53:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001175319.GA16313@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151001161916.GK24077@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 10/01, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> zap_process will add SIGKILL to all threads but the
> current which will go on without being killed and if this is not a
> thread group leader then we would miss it.

Yes. And note that de_thread() does the same. Speaking of oom-killer
this is mostly fine, the execing thread is going to release its old
->mm and it has already passed the copy_strings() stage which can use
a lot more memory.

But in theory (in practice currently this seems impossible without
SIGKILL) exec can fail before exec_mmap(), so if we want to zap its
->mm we need to ensure it can't return to user space.

> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Thanks!

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-01 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-29 14:17 [PATCH -mm 0/3] mm/oom_kill: ensure we actually kill all tasks sharing the same mm Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-29 14:18 ` [PATCH -mm 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-29 22:36   ` David Rientjes
2015-09-30  1:42     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-09-30 13:47       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-30 15:20         ` [PATCH -mm 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrongfatal_signal_pending() Tetsuo Handa
2015-09-30 13:43     ` [PATCH -mm 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-29 14:18 ` [PATCH -mm 2/3] mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same memory" Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-29 22:39   ` David Rientjes
2015-09-30 13:49     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-29 14:18 ` [PATCH -mm 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-29 22:41   ` David Rientjes
2015-09-30 13:50     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-30  2:16   ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-09-30 13:59     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-30 18:23 ` [PATCH -mm v2 0/3] mm/oom_kill: ensure we actually kill all tasks sharing the same mm Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-30 18:24   ` [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-30 21:14     ` David Rientjes
2015-10-01 10:52       ` [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending()check " Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-01 12:49     ` [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] mm/oom_kill: remove the wrong fatal_signal_pending() check " Michal Hocko
2015-10-01 15:00       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-01 15:27         ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-01 15:41           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-01 16:19             ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-01 17:53               ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-10-02 11:32                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-02 12:11                   ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-02 12:33                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-02 13:32                       ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-02 13:57                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-02 14:24                           ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-02 14:07                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-10-02 14:15                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-02 13:52                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-02 14:36                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-09-30 18:24   ` [PATCH -mm v2 2/3] mm/oom_kill: cleanup the "kill sharing same memory" loop Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-30 21:15     ` David Rientjes
2015-10-01 12:50     ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-30 18:24   ` [PATCH -mm v2 3/3] mm/oom_kill: fix the wrong task->mm == mm checks in oom_kill_process() Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-30 21:15     ` David Rientjes
2015-10-01 12:56     ` Michal Hocko
2015-10-01 22:24     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151001175319.GA16313@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kwalker@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=skozina@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).