Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/38] perf tools: Save mmap_param.len instead of mask

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

Em Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> It is more convenient saving mmap length rather than (bit) mask.  With
> this patch, we can eliminate dependency to perf_evlist other than
> getting mmap_desc for dealing with mmaps.  The mask and length can be
> converted using perf_evlist__mmap_mask/len().
> 
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index c5180a29db1b..e46adcd5b408 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  
>  static void perf_evlist__mmap_put(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx);
>  static void __perf_evlist__munmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx);
> +static size_t perf_evlist__mmap_mask(size_t len);
> +static size_t perf_evlist__mmap_len(size_t mask);

Are these "perf_evlist" methods? I don't think so, those are related to
"perf_mmap".

>  #define FD(e, x, y) (*(int *)xyarray__entry(e->fd, x, y))
>  #define SID(e, x, y) xyarray__entry(e->sample_id, x, y)
> @@ -871,7 +873,9 @@ void __weak auxtrace_mmap_params__set_idx(
>  static void __perf_evlist__munmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx)
>  {
>  	if (evlist->mmap[idx].base != NULL) {
> -		munmap(evlist->mmap[idx].base, evlist->mmap_len);
> +		size_t mmap_len = perf_evlist__mmap_len(evlist->mmap[idx].mask);

I.e. here you could have it as:

		size_t mmap_len = perf_mmap__len(evlist->mmap[idx]);

> +
> +		munmap(evlist->mmap[idx].base, mmap_len);
>  		evlist->mmap[idx].base = NULL;
>  		atomic_set(&evlist->mmap[idx].refcnt, 0);
>  	}
> @@ -901,8 +905,8 @@ static int perf_evlist__alloc_mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>  }
>  
>  struct mmap_params {
> -	int prot;
> -	int mask;
> +	int	prot;
> +	size_t	len;
>  	struct auxtrace_mmap_params auxtrace_mp;
>  };
>  
> @@ -924,8 +928,8 @@ static int __perf_evlist__mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx,
>  	 */
>  	atomic_set(&evlist->mmap[idx].refcnt, 2);
>  	evlist->mmap[idx].prev = 0;
> -	evlist->mmap[idx].mask = mp->mask;
> -	evlist->mmap[idx].base = mmap(NULL, evlist->mmap_len, mp->prot,
> +	evlist->mmap[idx].mask = perf_evlist__mmap_mask(mp->len);

Here, since you're not using a perf_mmap instance, but the calculation
is relative to a perf_mmap property, we would use:

	evlist->mmap[idx].mask = __perf_mmap__mask(mp->len);
	

> +	evlist->mmap[idx].base = mmap(NULL, mp->len, mp->prot,
>  				      MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>  	if (evlist->mmap[idx].base == MAP_FAILED) {
>  		pr_debug2("failed to mmap perf event ring buffer, error %d\n",
> @@ -1071,6 +1075,21 @@ static size_t perf_evlist__mmap_size(unsigned long pages)
>  	return (pages + 1) * page_size;
>  }
>  
> +static size_t perf_evlist__mmap_mask(size_t len)
> +{
> +	BUG_ON(len <= page_size);
> +	BUG_ON((len % page_size) != 0);
> +
> +	return len - page_size - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static size_t perf_evlist__mmap_len(size_t mask)
> +{
> +	BUG_ON(((mask + 1) % page_size) != 0);
> +
> +	return mask + 1 + page_size;
> +}
> +
>  static long parse_pages_arg(const char *str, unsigned long min,
>  			    unsigned long max)
>  {
> @@ -1176,7 +1195,7 @@ int perf_evlist__mmap_ex(struct perf_evlist *evlist, unsigned int pages,
>  	evlist->overwrite = overwrite;
>  	evlist->mmap_len = perf_evlist__mmap_size(pages);
>  	pr_debug("mmap size %zuB\n", evlist->mmap_len);
> -	mp.mask = evlist->mmap_len - page_size - 1;
> +	mp.len = evlist->mmap_len;
>  
>  	auxtrace_mmap_params__init(&mp.auxtrace_mp, evlist->mmap_len,
>  				   auxtrace_pages, auxtrace_overwrite);
> -- 
> 2.6.0