From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 11/11] arm: boot: dts: omap: add missing default status for 32k counter
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:52:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151005175230.GG18784@saruman.tx.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22213826.1MtkNIZ6W3@wuerfel>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2765 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:58:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 09:12:09 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:15:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 29 September 2015 15:44:06 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > All devices should have a default status. Ignoring
> > > > the arguments if it should be 'okay' or 'disabled'
> > > > by default, let's set them all the 'disabled' and
> > > > have boards enable 32k counter.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > > >
> > >
> > > The patch looks good, but the description is slightly incorrect:
> > > There is no reason to list "status='okay'" other than overriding
> > > the 'disabled' status.
> > >
> > > I'd phrase it something like:
> > >
> > > "We want the use of the 32k counter to be a per-board setting,
> > > so let's disable it by default in each dtsi file and override the
> > > setting in the boards. Any board that does not wire up the counter
> > > should leave it disabled".
> > >
> > > However, if you really want all boards to provide the counter all
> > > the time, I'd argue that we're better off dropping this patch. We
> > > use the status="disabled" trick for anything that may or may not
> > > be working based on the board design, but things that are present
> > > everywhere don't need this.
> >
> > okay, so here's the thing. While fiddling with the 32k counter, I noticed
> > that even though there was no status listed, the thing still initializes
> > fine. However, when moving 32k to drivers/clocksource and using
> > CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(), 32k would *NOT* probe unless I had an explicit
> > status = "okay" in DT.
>
> Very strange, that sounds like a bug in the clocksource probe code.
> Can you check how this happens?
seems like something overwrites counter's status field, here's a snippet of boot
log:
[ 0.000000] ===> counter is available ??
[ 0.000000] ===> no status -> TRUE!!
[ 0.000000] ===> searching for timer
[ 0.000000] ===> timer is available ??
[ 0.000000] ===> no status -> TRUE!!
[ 0.000005] sched_clock: 64 bits at 1000MHz, resolution 1ns, wraps every 4398046511103ns
[ 0.000014] clocksource: arm_global_timer: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x1cd42e4dffb, max_idle_ns: 881590591483 ns
[ 0.000047] ===> searching for timer
[ 0.000051] ===> timer is available ??
[ 0.000054] ===> no status -> TRUE!!
[ 0.000307] ===> searching for counter
[ 0.000311] ===> counter is available ??
[ 0.000315] ===> counter status disabled
[ 0.000318] ====> counter NOT available
note that first time around counter had no status and later it got a status
disabled from somewhere.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-29 20:43 [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:43 ` [RFC/PATCH 01/11] arm: omap2: timer: get rid of obfuscating macros Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:43 ` [RFC/PATCH 02/11] arm: omap2: timer: add a gptimer argument to sync32k_timer_init() Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:43 ` [RFC/PATCH 03/11] arm: omap2: timer: remove __omap_gptimer_init() Felipe Balbi
2015-10-05 11:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-05 15:24 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-10-05 16:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-05 16:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-10-05 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-09-29 20:43 ` [RFC/PATCH 04/11] arm: omap2: timer: provide generic sync32k_timer_init function Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 05/11] arm: omap2: timer: move realtime_counter_init() around Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 06/11] arm: omap2: timer: always call clocksource_of_init() when DT Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 07/11] arm: omap2: timer: remove omap4_local_timer_init Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 08/11] arm: omap2: timer: rename omap_sync32k_timer_init() Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 09/11] clocksource: add TI 32.768 Hz counter driver Felipe Balbi
2015-10-01 21:58 ` John Stultz
2015-10-01 21:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-10-05 10:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-05 11:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-01 22:20 ` John Stultz
2015-10-01 22:30 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 10/11] arm: omap2: timer: limit hwmod usage to non-DT boots Felipe Balbi
2015-09-29 20:44 ` [RFC/PATCH 11/11] arm: boot: dts: omap: add missing default status for 32k counter Felipe Balbi
2015-09-30 8:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-30 14:12 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-09-30 21:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-05 17:52 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2015-10-05 19:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-10-06 8:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-06 14:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-10-06 15:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-06 15:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-10-05 10:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-09-30 8:22 ` [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-30 14:13 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-09-30 14:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-30 14:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-30 14:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-09-30 15:03 ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-01 22:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-10-05 10:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-05 11:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-05 11:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-10-05 12:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151005175230.GG18784@saruman.tx.rr.com \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).