From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751922AbbJFINh (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 04:13:37 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35907 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751451AbbJFINe (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 04:13:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:11:50 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Alexander Kapshuk Cc: linux-kernel , Jim Davis , richard@nod.at, "Theodore Ts'o" Subject: Re: ver_linux: proposed implementation feedback request Message-ID: <20151006081150.GA19014@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:00:40PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Thanks very much for everyone's feedback. > > Instead of flooding this mailing list with another bunch of ver_linux > patches, I thought I would post another implementation, and see if you > find any of the proposed changes worth submitting as a patch. I will > be happy with whatever feedback you can give me. And we will leave it > at that. Thanks. We can't try to do a diff ourselves in order to try to determine if this is "good enough" to take, sorry, that's not hoe kernel development works. If you don't think it's "good enough", then we sure don't :) If you want to redo your series, to fix issues you have found, great, please do so and resend them and we will be glad to review them, as we have been doing. We can work with that, not with a "raw" file like this. thanks, greg k-h