From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752641AbbJFSyP (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:54:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37183 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752293AbbJFSyO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:54:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:50:56 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Josh Triplett Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/13] percpu-rwsem patches for 4.4 Message-ID: <20151006185055.GA15844@redhat.com> References: <20151006164514.GA15516@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151006174226.GK9600@cloud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151006174226.GK9600@cloud> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/06, Josh Triplett wrote: > > For all 13: > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett Thanks! > Regarding the rcu_sync infrastructure: odd that an atomic read > on the reader proves ligher weight than > rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock(). Cough... Could you spell? ;) I am just curious and I can't understand what do you mean. Oleg.