From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751656AbbJGLID (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2015 07:08:03 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38706 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751026AbbJGLIA (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2015 07:08:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:07:55 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Stephen Boyd , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Nishanth Menon , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: fix debugfs files for 64-bit Message-ID: <20151007110755.GA6601@kroah.com> References: <5706174.BUsqiXljxZ@wuerfel> <20151007105911.GC9892@linux> <20151007110302.GD9892@linux> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151007110302.GD9892@linux> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 04:33:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-10-15, 16:29, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > What about adding something like debugfs_create_unsigned_long() for > > such cases? > > And that can be as simple (or ugly, not sure if its buggy) as: > > debugfs_create_unsigned_long() > { > if (sizeof(unsigned long) == sizeof(u32)) > return debugfs_create_u32(); > if (sizeof(unsigned long) == sizeof(u64)) > return debugfs_create_u64(); > > return -EINVAL; > } Why would you be wanting to create a "unsigned long" as an api anyway? Just force it to be u64 all the time, can't you do that? thanks, greg k-h