From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
josh@joshtriplett.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
oleg@redhat.com, rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
kbuild-all@01.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
bobby prani <bobby.prani@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rnp() to allow consolidation
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:28:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151007142823.GI3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151007142133.GA18322@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:21:33PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:55:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > How about not building when there's no "^Signed-off-by:" at all?
>
> That's a good idea: no need to test quick demo-of-idea patches.
>
> > Even private build fails for patches like this -- esp. 3+ -- gets
> > annoying real quick.
> >
> > Also note that this 'patch' has: $subject ~ /^Re:/, nor did it have
> > "^Subject:" like headers in the body.
>
> That's good clues, too. So how about make the rule
>
> Skip test if no "^Signed-off-by:" and Subject =~ /^Re:/
>
> For a patch posted inside a discussion thread, as long as it have
> "^Signed-off-by:", I guess the author is serious and the patch could
> be tested seriously.
Works for me; now hoping I will abide by my own suggested rules ;-)
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-06 16:29 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/18] Expedited grace-period improvements for 4.4 Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/18] rcu: Use rsp->expedited_wq instead of sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rnp() to allow consolidation Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 20:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-06 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 8:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-10-07 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 12:05 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:09 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:11 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 13:44 ` [kbuild-all] " Fengguang Wu
2015-10-07 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 14:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-10-07 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-10-07 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 17:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 0:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/18] rcu: Consolidate tree setup for synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/18] rcu: Use single-stage IPI algorithm for RCU expedited grace period Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 18:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 15:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/18] rcu: Move synchronize_sched_expedited() to combining tree Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/18] rcu: Rename qs_pending to core_needs_qs Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/18] rcu: Invert passed_quiesce and rename to cpu_no_qs Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/18] rcu: Make ->cpu_no_qs be a union for aggregate OR Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/18] rcu: Switch synchronize_sched_expedited() to IPI Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/18] rcu: Stop silencing lockdep false positive for expedited grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/18] rcu: Stop excluding CPU hotplug in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/18] cpu: Remove try_get_online_cpus() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/18] rcu: Prepare for consolidating expedited CPU selection Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/18] rcu: Consolidate " Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/18] rcu: Add online/offline info to expedited stall warning message Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/18] rcu: Add tasks to expedited stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/18] rcu: Enable stall warnings for synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/18] rcu: Better hotplug handling for synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 18:01 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-09 0:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 0:48 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-09 3:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151007142823.GI3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).