From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753585AbbJHHqc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:46:32 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:52429 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752704AbbJHHq3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Oct 2015 03:46:29 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 00:46:16 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        kbuild-all@01.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 4/5 v2] pseries/iommu: implement DDW-aware
 dma_get_page_shift
Message-ID: <20151008074616.GA16089@infradead.org>
References: <201510030421.d9fvrbXU%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <1444102746.16909.4.camel@ellerman.id.au>
 <20151007135602.GA17377@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <1444263119.31685.4.camel@ellerman.id.au>
 <20151008010603.GA24198@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <20151008011609.GA25163@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151008011609.GA25163@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Fengguang,

I think this proactive testing does a little more harm than good in
it's current form.  While offering testing for patches that aren't in
git trees and or by people that don't even have a git tree that the
build bots known about does seem useful, blindly doing it for every
patch against something that most likely isn't the right base seems
counter intertuitive.  We'll probaby need some annotation in the O/n
mail that asks for a test and sets a base tree to actually make it
useful.  With those few tweaks it should be really useful!

Maybe we should have a discussion about this at kernel summit?


On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 09:16:09AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> And of course linux-kernel. More lists could be added in future.
> 
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
---end quoted text---