From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933384AbbJHRci (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:32:38 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52561 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932673AbbJHRch (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:32:37 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:32:23 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/vmacache: inline vmacache_valid_mm()
Message-ID: <20151008173223.GB2594@linux-uzut.site>
Mail-Followup-To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
References: <1444277879-22039-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20151008062115.GA876@swordfish>
 <20151008132331.GC3353@linux-uzut.site>
 <20151008134358.GA601@swordfish>
 <20151008165539.GA2594@linux-uzut.site>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151008165539.GA2594@linux-uzut.site>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 08 Oct 2015, Bueso wrote:
>Thinking a bit more about it, we don't want to be making vmacache_valid_mm()
>visible, as users should only stick to vmacache_valid() calls.
                                         ^^ s/vmacache_valid/vmacache_update

(cache validity is always internal, obviously).