From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751951AbbJLImY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:42:24 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:62935 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751481AbbJLImW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:42:22 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,671,1437462000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="662489077"
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:53:51 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4.3 group scheduling regression
Message-ID: <20151012005351.GJ11102@intel.com>
References: <1444292390.3389.100.camel@gmail.com>
 <201510081054.t98AsL1U003456@como.maths.usyd.edu.au>
 <20151008111959.GM3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1444483369.2804.9.camel@gmail.com>
 <20151010170142.GI3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1444530318.3363.40.camel@gmail.com>
 <1444585321.4169.18.camel@gmail.com>
 <20151012072344.GM3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <1444635897.3425.19.camel@gmail.com>
 <20151012080407.GJ3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151012080407.GJ3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Good morning, Peter.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:04:07AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:44:57AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > It's odd to me that things look pretty much the same good/bad tree with
> > hogs vs hogs or hogs vs tbench (with top anyway, just adding up times).
> > Seems Xorg+mplayer more or less playing cross group ping-pong must be
> > the BadThing trigger.
>
> Ohh, wait, Xorg and mplayer are _not_ in the same group? I was assuming
> you had your entire user session in 1 (auto) group and was competing
> against 8 manual cgroups.
> 
> So how exactly are things configured?
 
Hmm... my impression is the naughty boy mplayer (+Xorg) isn't favored, due 
to the per CPU group entity share distribution. Let me dig more.

Sorry.