From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752620AbbJLNf3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:35:29 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45643 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752168AbbJLNf0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:35:26 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:35:20 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 18/38] perf tools: Introduce
 thread__find_addr_location_by_time() and friends
Message-ID: <20151012133520.GA16529@krava.brq.redhat.com>
References: <1443763159-29098-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
 <1443763159-29098-19-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1443763159-29098-19-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:18:59PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

> +void thread__find_addr_map(struct thread *thread, u8 cpumode,
> +			   enum map_type type, u64 addr,
> +			   struct addr_location *al)
> +{
> +	al->thread = thread;
> +	map_groups__find_addr_map(thread->mg, cpumode, type, addr, al);
> +}
> +
> +void thread__find_addr_map_by_time(struct thread *thread, u8 cpumode,
> +				   enum map_type type, u64 addr,
> +				   struct addr_location *al, u64 timestamp)
> +{
> +	struct map_groups *mg;
> +
> +	if (perf_has_index)
> +		mg = thread__get_map_groups(thread, timestamp);
> +	else
> +		mg = thread->mg;
> +
> +	al->thread = thread;
> +	map_groups__find_addr_map(mg, cpumode, type, addr, al);
> +}
> +
>  void thread__find_addr_location(struct thread *thread,
>  				u8 cpumode, enum map_type type, u64 addr,
>  				struct addr_location *al)
> @@ -985,6 +1006,23 @@ void thread__find_addr_location(struct thread *thread,
>  		al->sym = NULL;
>  }
>  
> +void thread__find_addr_location_by_time(struct thread *thread, u8 cpumode,
> +					enum map_type type, u64 addr,
> +					struct addr_location *al, u64 timestamp)
> +{
> +	if (perf_has_index)
> +		thread__find_addr_map_by_time(thread, cpumode, type, addr, al,
> +					      timestamp);
> +	else
> +		thread__find_addr_map(thread, cpumode, type, addr, al);

hum, we make the 'perf_has_index' decision here and also in
thread__find_addr_map_by_time which seems to have the same code
as thread__find_addr_map for !perf_has_index case

it seems redundant to have both original and _by_time versions
why not just thread__find_cpumode_addr_location with time arg?

also how about other callers of original versions like
thread__find_addr_location call in util/unwind-libunwind.c ?

jirka