From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752155AbbJLSWN (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:22:13 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:43751 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751529AbbJLSWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:22:12 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:22:07 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Christoph Lameter , Chris Metcalf , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Mike Galbraith , Dave Jones , Thomas Gleixner , Oleg Nesterov , Alexey Dobriyan , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Message-ID: <20151012182207.GH3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1444663283-30068-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20151012153202.GB3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151012162001.GA32228@lerouge> <20151012165353.GF3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <561BE5FC.1020300@ezchip.com> <20151012174238.GA1113@lerouge> <20151012175208.GG3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151012175459.GD1113@lerouge> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151012175459.GD1113@lerouge> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15101218-0021-0000-0000-00001399D882 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 07:55:01PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:52:08AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:45:08PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > > > But yeah if you guys want to create a new parameter that gathers nohz > > > > and isolcpus I think we can. > > > > > > Could we also add the rcu settings? > > > > I thought that I already had. What am I still missing? > > > > > > task_isolation is really just about tasks so it should be another name. > > > > > > no_os_cpus? > > > > > > os_free_cpus? > > > > os_jitter_free_cpus? > > > > clean_cpus? > > > > quiet_cpus? > > > > I have no problem with any of the names proposed thus far, but obviously > > could not resist the urge to propose a few more. > > I moved forward quite slowly with nohz full over the years but at least I'm proud > that this subsystem introduced some of the most interesting naming challenges! ;-) ;-) ;-) Thanx, Paul