Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories

Saravana Kannan
2015-10-13T19:25:23Z

On 10/12/2015 11:15 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-10-15, 12:31, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> Can we use the first CPU in the related CPUs mask? Instead of the
>> first CPU that the policy got created on? The policyX numbering
>> would be a bit more consistent that way.
>
> Okay, checked this again. The problem is that ->init() isn't called
> yet and we are very early in the initialization sequence. So, we can't
> really know related_cpus yet. So I will keep it unchanged for now.
>

Can we move the sysfs add to the end so that by the time we add sysfs,
we'll have all the details?

-Saravana

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project