Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection

Lee Jones
2015-10-14T12:30:24Z

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:28:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > > Providing Acks should not (and has not to my knowledge) be a binding
> > > > contract to continue providing Acks. However, should more bindings be
> > > > submitted which appear as though they are related to a particular
> > > > maintainer, then sure, you'll be asked for your expert eye again.
>
> > > It's a bit concerning when it seems like my review is becoming a blocker
> > > for something and I don't understand why.
>
> > Not necessarily _your_ review. Just someone, other than the
> > submitter, who I trust and knows about this stuff. You just happen
> > to tick those boxes this time. Cross pollination and knowledge sharing
> > is one of the characteristics of MLs which I'm particularly proud of.
>
> That was what it read like.
>
> > > When your power budget is in the low double digit microamps and you're
> > > trying to respond promptly and reliably to rapidly changing and variable
> > > physical inputs it gets complicated.
>
> > This is exactly why I asked you.
>
> > Thanks for adding structure to my PoV. ;)
>
> So, a more specific question would have helped - just a general "any
> thoughts" type question isn't very clear.

To both comments -- this is how I phrased it:

"I either need an Ack from the DT folks, or at least someone who knows
about this stuff. Mark perhaps."

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog