Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection

Mark Brown
2015-10-14T09:49:26Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1311 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:28:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> > > Providing Acks should not (and has not to my knowledge) be a binding
> > > contract to continue providing Acks. However, should more bindings be
> > > submitted which appear as though they are related to a particular
> > > maintainer, then sure, you'll be asked for your expert eye again.

> > It's a bit concerning when it seems like my review is becoming a blocker
> > for something and I don't understand why.

> Not necessarily _your_ review. Just someone, other than the
> submitter, who I trust and knows about this stuff. You just happen
> to tick those boxes this time. Cross pollination and knowledge sharing
> is one of the characteristics of MLs which I'm particularly proud of.

That was what it read like.

> > When your power budget is in the low double digit microamps and you're
> > trying to respond promptly and reliably to rapidly changing and variable
> > physical inputs it gets complicated.

> This is exactly why I asked you.

> Thanks for adding structure to my PoV. ;)

So, a more specific question would have helped - just a general "any
thoughts" type question isn't very clear.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]