From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932418AbbJMOiM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:38:12 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:35922 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752295AbbJMOiK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:38:10 -0400
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:37:46 +0200
From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT
 "/chosen/linux,atags" entry
Message-ID: <20151013143746.GJ23104@pali>
References: <1436214373-12969-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com>
 <20150713131902.GH26485@atomide.com>
 <20151012201640.GQ23801@atomide.com>
 <201510122225.12786@pali>
 <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20151012204509.GT23801@atomide.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [151012 13:29]:
> > On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > 
> > > Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments
> > > addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree
> > > what needs to be done.
> > 
> > Tony, I'm not really sure what to do. Just wrap 4 and 5 patches into 
> > CONFIG_KEXEC? Or something more?
> 
> Well for most part your patches are fine, I think there were some
> minor comments on the series.
> 
> For the CONFIG_KEXEC dependency, we should just keep the existing
> behavior and keep /proc/atags behind CONFIG_KEXEC. That's all
> I believe :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
> 

Ok. I will add CONFIG_KEXEC into atag patches.

And there is missing documentation for these two new DT properties
(marked as TODO in commit messages). Where to put them?

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com