From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753372AbbJNMaY (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:30:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:32953 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753156AbbJNMaU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:30:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:30:14 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: Charles Keepax , cw00.choi@samsung.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection Message-ID: <20151014123014.GJ32409@x1> References: <1443803363-3251-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1443803363-3251-5-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20151007100017.GB12635@sirena.org.uk> <20151007122642.GH17172@x1> <20151012084554.GB8805@ck-lbox> <20151012134309.GE1542@sirena.org.uk> <20151013080218.GV17172@x1> <20151013151252.GH14956@sirena.org.uk> <20151014072812.GE32409@x1> <20151014094903.GP14956@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20151014094903.GP14956@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:28:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Providing Acks should not (and has not to my knowledge) be a binding > > > > contract to continue providing Acks. However, should more bindings be > > > > submitted which appear as though they are related to a particular > > > > maintainer, then sure, you'll be asked for your expert eye again. > > > > It's a bit concerning when it seems like my review is becoming a blocker > > > for something and I don't understand why. > > > Not necessarily _your_ review. Just someone, other than the > > submitter, who I trust and knows about this stuff. You just happen > > to tick those boxes this time. Cross pollination and knowledge sharing > > is one of the characteristics of MLs which I'm particularly proud of. > > That was what it read like. > > > > When your power budget is in the low double digit microamps and you're > > > trying to respond promptly and reliably to rapidly changing and variable > > > physical inputs it gets complicated. > > > This is exactly why I asked you. > > > Thanks for adding structure to my PoV. ;) > > So, a more specific question would have helped - just a general "any > thoughts" type question isn't very clear. To both comments -- this is how I phrased it: "I either need an Ack from the DT folks, or at least someone who knows about this stuff. Mark perhaps." -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog