From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752942AbbJPC3N (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:29:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41455 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751600AbbJPC3L (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:29:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:28:52 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Fenghua Yu , H Peter Anvin , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , x86 , Vikas Shivappa Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology Support Message-ID: <20151016022851.GA9008@amt.cnet> References: <1443766185-61618-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> <20151013213125.GA16200@amt.cnet> <20151015113614.GL3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151015113614.GL3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 06:31:27PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > I am rewriting the interface with ioctls, with commands similar to the > > syscall interface proposed. > > Which is horrible for other use cases. I really don't see the problem > with the cgroup stuff. Can you detail what "horrible" means?