Stable queue is caught up on for 3.10, 3.14, 4.1, and 4.2-stable kernels

Stable queue is caught up on for 3.10, 3.14, 4.1, and 4.2-stable kernels

[Greg KH]

Hi all,

I've finally caught up on all pending patches for the above mentioned
stable kernels that have either hit Linus's tree with a stable@ or
fixes: marking, or have been emailed to the stable@ list requesting to
be included.

Note, I have not included anything since 4.2-rc5 was released, those 38
patches will end up in the next round, I need to wait until they show up
in a public release from Linus before I can apply them.

So, if you have sent in a patch to be included, and don't see it in
these latest round of -rc releases, consider it lost and please resend.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: Stable queue is caught up on for 3.10, 3.14, 4.1, and 4.2-stable kernels

[Willy Tarreau]

Hi Greg,

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:09:52PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've finally caught up on all pending patches for the above mentioned
> stable kernels that have either hit Linus's tree with a stable@ or
> fixes: marking, or have been emailed to the stable@ list requesting to
> be included.

Impressed :-)

I'm seeing that each series ends with patch (N-1)/N, so I think something
changed in your scripts, either N is wrong in which case we can ignore
this, or the last patch of each series was not sent.

Could you please double-check ?

Thanks,
Willy

Re: Stable queue is caught up on for 3.10, 3.14, 4.1, and 4.2-stable kernels

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 07:56:06AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:09:52PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I've finally caught up on all pending patches for the above mentioned
> > stable kernels that have either hit Linus's tree with a stable@ or
> > fixes: marking, or have been emailed to the stable@ list requesting to
> > be included.
> 
> Impressed :-)
> 
> I'm seeing that each series ends with patch (N-1)/N, so I think something
> changed in your scripts, either N is wrong in which case we can ignore
> this, or the last patch of each series was not sent.
> 
> Could you please double-check ?

I see it on my end, and I got the cc:.  vger likes to reject some of the
patches due to odd mime-encoding issues as it fights between git
send-email and how it creates the patches.  So maybe that was one of
them, I know I got many bounces this time around.

I don't really know how to resolve this, sorry.

greg k-h

Re: Stable queue is caught up on for 3.10, 3.14, 4.1, and 4.2-stable kernels

[Willy Tarreau]

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:02:37PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 07:56:06AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 07:09:52PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I've finally caught up on all pending patches for the above mentioned
> > > stable kernels that have either hit Linus's tree with a stable@ or
> > > fixes: marking, or have been emailed to the stable@ list requesting to
> > > be included.
> > 
> > Impressed :-)
> > 
> > I'm seeing that each series ends with patch (N-1)/N, so I think something
> > changed in your scripts, either N is wrong in which case we can ignore
> > this, or the last patch of each series was not sent.
> > 
> > Could you please double-check ?
> 
> I see it on my end, and I got the cc:.  vger likes to reject some of the
> patches due to odd mime-encoding issues as it fights between git
> send-email and how it creates the patches. So maybe that was one of
> them, I know I got many bounces this time around.

yes indeed I've met this as well.

> I don't really know how to resolve this, sorry.

No problem, I wanted to be sure that you didn't break something in your
scripts.

Thanks!
Willy