From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932125AbbJRQFn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:05:43 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49969 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753006AbbJRQFl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:05:41 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:05:40 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/54] 3.10.91-stable review
Message-ID: <20151018160540.GA9619@kroah.com>
References: <20151018020314.063429128@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20151018070554.GA31954@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151018070554.GA31954@1wt.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:05:54AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> neither 3.10.91-rc1 nor 3.14.55-rc1 are online. I guess you forgot
> to upload them. 4.1.11-rc1 and 4.2.4-rc1 are there however.

Hm, something did go wrong with my scripts and the patches didn't get
signed properly, so they didn't get uploaded, thanks for noticing,
should now be fixed.

greg k-h