From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/6] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 PMIC
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:48:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019184826.GX2711@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v66y9+_iemTn-AXQUPBRX=ZEQFfXgbVnwRzviDNfCSm_eQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3976 bytes --]
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:20:29PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 02:46:23PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Maxime Ripard
> >> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:32:19AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> >> The AXP223 is a new PMIC commonly paired with Allwinner A23/A33 SoCs.
> >> >> It is functionally identical to AXP221; only the regulator default
> >> >> voltage/status and the external host interface are different.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 12 ++++++
> >> >> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> >> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x-core.c | 2 +
> >> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 1 +
> >> >> 5 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> >> >> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> >> index 9ba3feb3f2fc..6e5edb61d42e 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> >> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ config MFD_BCM590XX
> >> >> config MFD_AXP20X
> >> >> bool "X-Powers AXP series PMICs"
> >> >> select MFD_AXP20X_I2C
> >> >> + select MFD_AXP20X_RSB
> >> >>
> >> >> config MFD_AXP20X_CORE
> >> >> bool
> >> >> @@ -102,6 +103,17 @@ config MFD_AXP20X_I2C
> >> >> components like regulators or the PEK (Power Enable Key) under the
> >> >> corresponding menus.
> >> >>
> >> >> +config MFD_AXP20X_RSB
> >> >> + bool "X-Powers AXP series RSB PMICs"
> >> >> + select MFD_AXP20X_CORE
> >> >> + depends on SUNXI_RSB=y
> >> >
> >> > Do we need that? Even if the bus is compiled as a module, the driver
> >> > will not be probed before that, will it?
> >>
> >> There's a compile/link dependency on the __devm_regmap_init_sunxi_rsb().
> >
> > If it's exported, everything should be fine, no?
> >
> >> And both drivers are bool, i.e. can't be compiled as a module. What we
> >> don't want is enabling MFD_AXP20X_RSB without SUNXI_RSB.
> >
> > What would really be the issue here? The driver wouldn't be probed,
> > and that's it. Or am I missing something?
>
> The RSB bus / slave device functions have been merged into the RSB driver
> itself. Enabling MFD_AXP20X_RSB without enabling SUNXI_RSB means that RSB
> bus/device related functions are not compiled, i.e. link error:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `axp20x_rsb_probe':
> /home/wens/sunxi/linux/drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c:64: undefined
> reference to `__devm_regmap_init_sunxi_rsb'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `axp20x_rsb_driver_init':
> /home/wens/sunxi/linux/drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c:89: undefined
> reference to `sunxi_rsb_driver_register'
> Makefile:927: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
>
> The dependency is like "depends on I2C=y" for the I2C version.
>
> If you're asking about why "=y", I guess it's because MFD_AXP20X_RSB is bool,
> and if the depended on symbol is a tristate, which it actually is for I2c,
> we'd want it to be compiled in, and not built as a module, or again we'd get
> a undefined reference link error.
Yeah, but my point was more why not have both the RSB driver and MFD
as a module? The part where RSB is a module and the driver is
statically built doesn't make sense (and I don't think a depends on
allow that), but having both make sense.
> Would it make sense to have SUNXI_RSB as a tristate symbol, i.e. can be built
> as a module? I'm nore sure. For multi-platform kernels, probably? Currently it
> isn't.
Yes, it's better for multi-platform / distro kernels.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 16:32 [PATCH 0/6] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-14 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] mfd: axp20x: Add AXP223 to list of supported PMICs in DT bindings Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-15 20:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-10-14 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] mfd: axp20x: Split the driver into core and i2c bits Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-14 20:22 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-14 22:37 ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2015-10-15 7:39 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-14 16:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] mfd: axp20x: Add support for RSB based AXP223 PMIC Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-14 17:47 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-14 23:00 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-16 6:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-10-16 6:46 ` [linux-sunxi] " Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-19 6:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-10-19 6:20 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-19 18:48 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2015-10-20 4:04 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-14 16:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] regulator: axp20x: Support new " Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-22 12:50 ` Mark Brown
2015-10-14 16:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add NMI interrupt controller node Chen-Yu Tsai
2015-10-16 6:44 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-10-14 16:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: sun8i: sinlinx-sina33: Add AXP223 PMIC device and regulator nodes Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019184826.GX2711@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox