From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752503AbbJUBAF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:00:05 -0400
Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:14437 "EHLO
	cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889AbbJUBAD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:00:03 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:59:53 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@ezchip.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/14] nohz_full: allow disabling the 1Hz minimum
 tick at boot
Message-ID: <20151020205953.5cfa9195@grimm.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <5626AF95.8090805@ezchip.com>
References: <1445373372-6567-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
	<1445373372-6567-9-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
	<20151020210331.GC29289@lerouge>
	<5626AF95.8090805@ezchip.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:18:13 -0400
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> wrote:

> So perhaps a boot flag is an acceptable compromise between
> "nothing" and a debugfs tweak?  It certainly does make it easier
> to hack on the task-isolation code, and likely other things where
> people are trying out fixes to subsystems where they are attempting
> to remove the reliance on the tick.
> 

Just change the name to:

this_will_crash_your_kernel_and_kill_your_kittens_debug_1hz_tick

-- Steve