Re: [PATCH 5/8] mm: memcontrol: account socket memory on unified hierarchy

Michal Hocko
2015-11-06T10:57:30Z

On Thu 05-11-15 17:52:00, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:55:22PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > This would be true if they moved on to the new cgroup API intentionally.
> > > The reality is more complicated though. AFAIK sysmted is waiting for
> > > cgroup2 already and privileged services enable all available resource
> > > controllers by default as I've learned just recently.
> >
> > Have you filed a report with them? I don't think they should turn them
> > on unless users explicitely configure resource control for the unit.
>
> Okay, verified with systemd people that they're not planning on
> enabling resource control per default.
>
> Inflammatory half-truths, man. This is not constructive.

What about Delegate=yes feature then? We have just been burnt by this
quite heavily. AFAIU nspawn@.service and nspawn@.service have this
enabled by default
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-commits/2014-November/007400.html

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs