linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timer: Lazily wakup nohz CPU when adding new timer.
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:49:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151023021951.GP3897@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022214003.GA22993@jnakajim-build>

On 22-10-15, 14:40, Yunhong Jiang wrote:
> A naive question is, why it's sure a tick will happen when the tickless 
> processor is in idle?

How do you get this impression? I don't think anyone has said that.

We are talking about deferrable timers, which by design are only
required if the target CPU is not-idle. If it is idle, then the timer
isn't required to be serviced until the CPU wakes up. And the CPU can
take whatever time it wants to wake up again.

> Is it because scheduler load balance is sure to send a 
> tick to the processor in future?

No. We aren't expecting the CPU to wake up any time soon. Just ignore
the deferrable timer.

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-23  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-28 18:48 [PATCH] timer: Lazily wakup nohz CPU when adding new timer Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-05 20:51 ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-11 18:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 22:47   ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-21 10:46     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-22 21:40       ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-23  2:19         ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-10-23 22:10           ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-24  3:20             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-10-26 16:26               ` Yunhong Jiang
2015-10-27 15:11       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-11-13 16:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151023021951.GP3897@ubuntu \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).