From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752720AbbJWJ0l (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 05:26:41 -0400
Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:44001 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752159AbbJWJ0i (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 05:26:38 -0400
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:26:37 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, arnd@arndb.de,
        Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@google.com>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        Sasha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        pebolle@tiscali.nl, mitchelh@codeaurora.org,
        Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT
Message-ID: <20151023092636.GX27420@8bytes.org>
References: <1444357388-30257-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>
 <20151014125620.GQ27420@8bytes.org>
 <1445488802.27202.67.camel@mhfsdcap03>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1445488802.27202.67.camel@mhfsdcap03>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
>      But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu
> has called a function of the mtk-smi).
>      So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them?

I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and
Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s).


	Joerg