From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"jmoyer@redhat.com" <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
"willy@linux.intel.com" <willy@linux.intel.com>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:19:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151026221930.GL19199@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iaKDYuP6ppAVk5UOhzmOEO4Q=N_+osB2D+aPoAzpeHvw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 05:56:30PM +0900, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > Also, DAX access isn't a property of mmap - it's a property
> > of the inode. We cannot do DAX access via mmap while mixing page
> > cache based access through file descriptor based interfaces. This
> > I why I'm adding an inode attribute (on disk) to enable per-file DAX
> > capabilities - either everything is via the DAX paths, or nothing
> > is.
> >
>
> Per-inode control sounds very useful, I'll look at a similar mechanism
> for the raw block case.
>
> However, still not quite convinced page-cache control is an inode-only
> property, especially when direct-i/o is not an inode-property. That
> said, I agree the complexity of handling mixed mappings of the same
> file is prohibitive.
We didn't get that choice with direct IO - support via O_DIRECT was
kinda inherited from other OS's(*). We still have all sorts of
coherency problems between buffered/mmap/direct IO on the same file,
and I'd really, really like to avoid making that same mistake again
with DAX.
i.e. We have a choice with DAX right now that will allow us to avoid
coherency problems that we know existi and can't solve right now.
Making DAX and inode property rather than a application context
property avoids those coherence problems as all access will play by
the same rules....
(*)That said, some other OS's did O_DIRECT as an inode property (e.g.
solaris) where O_DIRECT was only done if no other cached operations
were required (e.g. mmap), and so the fd would transparently shift
between buffered and O_DIRECT depending on external accesses to the
inode. This was not liked because of it's unpredictable effect on
CPU usage and IO latency....
> Sounds good, get blkdev_issue_flush() functional first and then worry
> about building a more efficient solution on top.
*nod*
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-26 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 6:41 [PATCH 0/5] block, dax: updates for 4.4 Dan Williams
2015-10-22 6:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Dan Williams
2015-10-22 6:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations Dan Williams
2015-10-22 9:26 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-22 6:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] block, dax: fix lifetime of in-kernel dax mappings with dax_map_atomic() Dan Williams
2015-10-22 6:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: introduce file_bd_inode() Dan Williams
2015-10-22 9:45 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-22 15:41 ` Dan Williams
2015-10-22 6:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices Dan Williams
2015-10-22 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-22 16:05 ` Williams, Dan J
2015-10-22 21:08 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-22 23:41 ` Williams, Dan J
2015-10-24 12:21 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-23 23:32 ` Dan Williams
2015-10-24 14:49 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-25 21:22 ` Dave Chinner
2015-10-26 2:48 ` Dan Williams
2015-10-26 6:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-10-26 7:20 ` Jan Kara
2015-10-26 8:56 ` Dan Williams
2015-10-26 22:19 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-10-27 22:55 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151026221930.GL19199@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).