From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753698AbbJ0JT2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 05:19:28 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:26305 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753566AbbJ0JTZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 05:19:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:19:03 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Muhammad Falak R Wani , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-rdma , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mike Marciniszyn , Doug Ledford , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] staging: ipath: ipath_driver: Use setup_timer Message-ID: <20151027091903.GA7340@mwanda> References: <1445768253-16107-1-git-send-email-falakreyaz@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani > wrote: > Please follow standard naming convention for the patches. > It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not [PATCH 1/4 v2]. Does this matter? It's in a thread so it sorts fine either way. regards, dan carpenter