From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754050AbbJ0LLE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:11:04 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:18808 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753175AbbJ0LLA (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:11:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:10:42 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-rdma , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mike Marciniszyn , Doug Ledford , Muhammad Falak R Wani , Sean Hefty , Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] staging: ipath: ipath_driver: Use setup_timer Message-ID: <20151027111042.GD7340@mwanda> References: <1445768253-16107-1-git-send-email-falakreyaz@gmail.com> <20151027091903.GA7340@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Dan Carpenter > wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Muhammad Falak R Wani > >> wrote: > >> Please follow standard naming convention for the patches. > >> It should be [PATCH v2 1/4] and not [PATCH 1/4 v2]. > > > > Does this matter? It's in a thread so it sorts fine either way. > It will be wise if people read guides and follow examples. > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches That document doesn't really specify one way or the other. And even if it did then why would you care? Stop being so picky for no reason. regards, dan carpenter