linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: axboe@fb.com, jack@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	david@fromorbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	willy@linux.intel.com, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem()
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:31:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027173112.GA16605@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151022171021.38343.65959.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:10:21PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> Both, __dax_pmd_fault, and clear_pmem() were taking special steps to
> clear memory a page at a time to take advantage of non-temporal
> clear_page() implementations.  However, x86_64 does not use
> non-temporal instructions for clear_page(), and arch_clear_pmem() was
> always incurring the cost of __arch_wb_cache_pmem().
> 
> Clean up the assumption that doing clear_pmem() a page at a time is more
> performant.
> 
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-27 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-22 17:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] block, dax: updates for 4.4 Dan Williams
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Dan Williams
2015-10-22 20:48   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 22:29     ` Dan Williams
2015-10-28 21:01       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-27 17:31   ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations Dan Williams
2015-10-22 21:04   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 22:57     ` Williams, Dan J
2015-10-28 21:02       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] block, dax: fix lifetime of in-kernel dax mappings with dax_map_atomic() Dan Williams
2015-10-28 20:15   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] block: introduce bdev_file_inode() Dan Williams
2015-10-22 20:37   ` Jan Kara
2015-10-28 20:16   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-22 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices Dan Williams
2015-10-28 20:50   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-29  7:14     ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151027173112.GA16605@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).