From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932736AbbJ1JjQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:39:16 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.4.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:47681 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968AbbJ1JjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:39:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:39:07 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Lee Jones , wsa@the-dreams.de, linus.walleij@linaro.org, Sebastian Reichel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , broonie@kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, Joe Perches , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Message-ID: <20151028093907.GP4931@pengutronix.de> References: <1445960557-24328-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20151027172428.GB21070@earth> <20151027181555.GE5828@x1> <1445971482.2757.27.camel@perches.com> <20151028082446.GF5828@x1> <56309419.4060908@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <56309419.4060908@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote: > > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion. > > That's not the case at all. All it does is better describe the (very > > worthy) function you *actually* provide. > > It is getting into dispute about entire change of yours... which is not > what I want. I agree with your general idea but I was referring only to > that particular case - the Samsung PMICs (and Maxim PMICs/MUICs which > would fall into same category). Not being affected by this change, I wonder what the technical difference is if someone is listed as reviewer instead of maintainer. Does get_maintainer.pl behave differently? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |